You already know which findings are likely to come up again. You know which control weaknesses you flagged in the last audit committee report and didn’t have the bandwidth to fix. And you know the examiner’s tone shifts when an issue lands in the report for a second cycle in a row.
The cost of a repeat finding isn’t the finding itself. It’s the audit committee’s confidence, the regulator’s posture heading into the next exam, and the time your team spends defending instead of building. A focused pre-exam engagement closes those gaps before they reach the report.
Our team has sat in the regulator’s seat. Our consultants average 25 years of industry experience and hold the credentials examiners look for: CAMS, CIA, CISA, and CRCM. We are entirely U.S.-based — no offshoring, no rotating junior staff. Most importantly, we tell you what an examiner will say before the examiner says it. That’s the difference between a clean exam and a cycle of remediation.
Every exam-prep engagement follows RADD’s proprietary four-step process, designed to deliver clean exams and board confidence.
We refresh your risk assessment against the latest FFIEC, FDIC, OCC, and NCUA guidance and surface the gaps an examiner is most likely to flag this cycle.
We work through your last exam letter and last internal audit report to close the open items examiners are most likely to revisit — organizing documentation and collecting control evidence as we go.
We run a focused mock exam across BSA/AML, IT and cyber, lending and deposit compliance, and your institution’s high-risk lines, so you see exactly what an examiner will see.
You get a board-ready report with findings, root cause, and a remediation plan tied to specific owners and deadlines — ready to hand straight to the audit committee.
The Playbook is a ten-area checklist your team can run through before the examiner walks in. It covers governance, BSA/AML, cybersecurity, third-party risk, internal audit, fair lending, and the topics examiners are actively probing in 2026.
Set yourself — and your institution — up for a clean exam in 2026.
The work compounds the earlier it starts. Six to nine months out gives time to refresh risk assessments, close repeat findings, run a mock exam, and put a remediation plan in motion. Three months out is still useful, but the focus narrows to triage and documentation.
No. Most engagements are with institutions that want a clean exam to stay clean. Enforcement remediation is a separate scope.
Engagement cost depends on institution size, risk profile, and the scope of pre-exam work. We provide a fixed-fee quote after a no-cost scoping conversation.
Yes. The entire engagement is built around exam readiness. Documentation is organized, control evidence is collected, and findings are framed the way an examiner will read them.
We work alongside your internal team. RADD supports and strengthens existing functions rather than replacing them.
Findings are delivered clearly, prioritized by risk, and tied to specific owners and deadlines — in a written report you can hand directly to the audit committee.
Yes. We frequently support institutions with follow-up remediation work after an exam, helping close findings and verify corrective actions.
Yes. We work with community banks and credit unions of varying sizes and complexity. Audit approaches are tailored to the institution, not forced into a one‑size‑fits‑all model.
BSA/AML, IT and cybersecurity, lending and deposit compliance, and any high-risk business lines specific to your institution. You see what an examiner will see before the examiner does.
If a clean exam, examiner confidence, and clear execution matter to your institution, a short scoping conversation will tell you quickly whether we’re the right fit.
If your next examination is on the calendar, the conversation is most useful six to nine months out. If it’s already close, we still have time. Let’s build your exam-prep plan.